Two different models of Canon digital cameras, the Canon EOS M200 and the Canon EOS M50 were presented to the public for the first time in September 2019 and February 2018, respectively. An APS-C sensor can be found inside the mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras M200 and M50. Both of these models also have the ability to change lenses. A resolution of 24 megapixels is available on both of the cameras.
As a starting point for the comparison, the following is an overview of the primary specifications of both cameras.
What other differences exist between the Canon EOS M200 and the Canon EOS M50 that aren’t covered in this quick comparison of the two cameras’ primary features and characteristics? Which one should you choose to purchase? Continue reading to find out how these two cameras stack up against one another in terms of the size of their bodies, the imaging sensors they contain, the shooting options they offer, the input-output connections they provide, and the reaction they received from professional reviewers.
The dimensions and weight of the Canon M200 and the Canon M50 are compared here in a table format that shows the two cameras side-by-side. The two cameras are discussed in light of their sizes in comparison to one another. There are three views that follow one another, beginning with the front view, moving to the top view, and ending with the rear view. Each dimension’s width, height, and depth are rounded to the nearest millimeter after being measured.
Both cameras are offered in a choice of two distinct hues each (black, white).
The Canon M50 is substantially larger (41 percent) than the Canon M200 when the front view area of the cameras is considered as an aggregate measure of their size. This area is represented by width times height. Additionally, in comparison to the M200, the M50 is thirty percent more cumbersome in weight. It is important to keep in mind that neither the M200 nor the M50 have their seams weather-sealed in this setting.
The size and weight comparisons that were presented earlier are, to some extent, insufficient because they do not take into account the fact that both of these cameras require interchangeable lenses. Therefore, in order to acquire a comprehensive understanding of the differences between the two camera systems in terms of their dimensions and weights, you need to investigate and evaluate the characteristics of the various lenses that are at your disposal.
The table that follows provides a summary of the primary physical characteristics shared by both of these cameras as well as those that are comparable. If you want to display and compare another camera pair, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your camera combination from a vast number of available alternatives. In this instance, you will be able to display and compare another camera pair.
Price is bound to play a significant role in whatsoever choice you make about a camera. At the time of the camera’s debut, retail prices placed the model in the market in comparison to other models in the producer’s line-up as well as the competitors. Because it was released at a price that was significantly less than the M50’s (by 30 percent), the M200 is in a distinct market category than the M50. In most cases, retail prices remain relatively constant for the first few months after a product’s launch, but after a few months, discounts become available. After a certain point in the life cycle of the product, and in particular just before the launch of the model’s successor, additional price reductions and stock clearance sales frequently drive the price of the camera to an all-time low. Then, once the new version of the model has been out, there are frequently excellent prices to be had on the pre-owned market.
One of the most important aspects that determine the image quality captured by a digital camera is the size of the sensor included within the device. If all other factors remain the same, a sensor with a larger surface area will have individual pixel-units that are larger in size. These larger pixel units will have greater low-light sensitivity, a wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor with the same technological generation. In addition, the photographer will have additional creative possibilities available to them when using a narrow depth-of-field to separate a subject from its background when using a camera with a big sensor. On the other hand, larger sensors are typically accompanied by larger and more expensive camera bodies and lenses. This is a disadvantage of larger sensors.
Both of the cameras are being considered to make use of an APS-C sensor and have a format factor of 1.6, which is also commonly referred to as the “crop factor.” This positions the review cameras within the spectrum of camera sensors known as the medium-sized sensor cameras, which strive to strike a balance between image quality and portability. The ratio of the sensor’s width to its height is 3:2 in both of the cameras’ default configurations.
Both of the cameras that are being compared here have sensors that are exactly the same size, therefore they both have the same resolution of 24 megapixels. Due to the similarities between the M200 and the M50’s sensor specifications, it can be deduced that both cameras have the same pixel density as well as the same pixel size. However, it is important to remember that the M200 is a somewhat more current model than the M50 (by one year and six months) and that its sensor may have benefited from technological advancements over this time. This is something that should be taken into consideration.
The native sensitivity range of the Canon EOS M200 extends from ISO 100 all the way up to ISO 25600. The Canon EOS M50 has a range of ISO settings that go from 100 to 25600, but the range may be expanded all the way up to 51200 if the user so chooses.
Both cameras make use of CMOS sensors, which stands for Complimentary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor, in terms of their imaging technology. The Bayer filter is utilized by both cameras in order to record RGB colors onto a photosensor grid that is square in shape. The majority of digital cameras have this particular configuration.
Since 2007, DXO Mark has been publishing sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a standardized technique. These values are provided on their website. This service is based on lab testing, and it provides ratings for each camera sensor’s dynamic range (“DXO Landscape”), color depth (“DXO Portrait”), and low-light sensitivity in addition to an overall score (“DXO Sports”). The information regarding the physical sensor properties and the results of the DXO sensor quality tests for a selection of comparator-cameras is presented in the table that can be found adjacent to this one.
Many of today’s cameras can record video in addition to still photographs, giving users the ability to do both with a single device. The sensors of both of the cameras under examination have read-out times that are quick enough to provide satisfactory moving pictures; however, the M200 has a higher frame rate than the M50. It is capable of recording video footage at 4k/25p, but the M50 is only capable of recording at 4k/24p.
Cameras, in addition to their bodies and their sensors, can and do differ in a wide variety of features. When photographing outside in bright sunshine, for instance, the M50’s electronic viewfinder with 2,360k dots can be of great assistance to the photographer. On the other hand, the M200 frames its shots using a live view and the LCD on the back of the camera. The following table compares the Canon M200 and Canon M50 digital SLR cameras to a number of other models that offer features that are comparable to those found in the Canon M200 and Canon M50.
The Canon M50 comes equipped with its own internal intervalometer. This gives the photographer the ability to capture time-lapse sequences, such as a flower budding, a sunset, or the rising of the moon, without having to invest in an external camera trigger and the software that goes along with it.
When it comes to saving imaging data, both the M200 and the M50 save their files to SDXC cards. This is true for both models. UHS-I memory cards, which allow for ultra-high-speed data transfer of up to 104 megabytes per second, are compatible with both of these cameras.
When it comes to some imaging applications, the degree to which a camera is able to communicate with the environment in which it is placed might be a crucial factor in the decision-making process for selecting a camera. The table that follows gives an overview of the connection between the Canon EOS M200 and the Canon EOS M50. In specifically, it focuses on the interfaces that the cameras (as well as selected comparators) provide for controlling accessories and transferring data.
It is notable that the M50 contains a microphone port, which can aid to increase the quality of audio recordings by attaching an external microphone. The M200 does not come equipped with a mic input of this kind.
The M200 is a modern model that features in the current product line-up of Canon. In contrast, the M50 has been discontinued. As a replacement in the same family of cameras, the M50 was superseded by the Canon M50 Mark II. On the official website of Canon, you may get additional information on the two cameras (such as user guides and manuals), in addition to information regarding related accessories.
How does everything add up, then? I’m trying to decide between the Canon M200 and the Canon M50. Which one do you recommend? Which of these cameras is superior? The table that follows provides a synopsis of the relative strengths that each of the two competitors has.
The Canon EOS M200 has the following advantages:
- Better video: Provides greater movie framerates (4k/25p versus 4K/24p).
- Being more compact means that it takes up less space in the bag because it is smaller (108x67mm as opposed to 116x88mm).
- Lighter: It weighs 91 grams less, which is a 23 percent reduction, and as a result, it is easier to transport.
- Longer lasting: is capable of taking more pictures (315 as opposed to 235) on a single charge of the battery.
- More affordable: Was introduced into a category with more affordable prices (30 percent cheaper at launch).
- Is to some degree more recent and so more modern (announced 1 year and 6 months after the M50).
In favor of the Canon EOS M50 are the following arguments:
- Better sound: The ability to connect to an external microphone allows for recordings with the higher overall quality.
- Easier framing: an electronic viewfinder is included for composing images and controlling the settings of the camera.
- More flexible LCD: Screen may be rotated to allow for shooting at unusual angles, whether in portrait or landscape mode.
- A quicker burst that takes pictures at a greater frequency (10 vs. 6.1 flaps/sec) in order to seize the moment of opportunity.
- Time-lapse photography is made much simpler with the built-in intervalometer, which allows for low-frequency shooting.
- Better lighting thanks to the presence of a hot shoe, which makes it possible to hold and fire an external flash gun.
- More significant reductions in price: Has a long history of existence in the market (launched in February 2018).
The M50 ekes out a narrow victory over the M200 when judged only on the basis of the number of distinct benefits it offers (detailed in the preceding bullet points) (7:6 points). You should, however, apply corresponding weights to the various individual camera aspects before making a decision on a new camera because the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary depending on personal preferences and needs. In light of this, you might find it helpful to apply corresponding weights to the various individual camera aspects. A professional wildlife photographer will interpret the differences between cameras in a way that is different from the perspective of a family photographer, and somebody who is interested in architecture will have different requirements than someone who shoots sports. Because of this, determining which camera is the best and whether or not it is worthwhile to purchase is typically a very personal choice.
Specifications: Canon M50 vs Canon M200
|Camera Model||Canon M200||Canon M50|
|Camera Type||Mirrorless system camera||Mirrorless system camera|
|Camera Lens||Canon EF-M mount lenses||Canon EF-M mount lenses|
|Launch Date||September 2019||February 2018|
|Launch Price||USD 549||USD 779|
|Sensor Specs||Canon M200||Canon M50|
|Sensor Format||APS-C Sensor||APS-C Sensor|
|Sensor Size||22.3 x 14.9 mm||22.3 x 14.9 mm|
|Sensor Area||332.27 mm2||332.27 mm2|
|Sensor Diagonal||26.8 mm||26.8 mm|
|Sensor Resolution||24 Megapixels||24 Megapixels|
|Image Resolution||6000 x 4000 pixels||6000 x 4000 pixels|
|Pixel Pitch||3.72 μm||3.72 μm|
|Pixel Density||7.22 MP/cm2||7.22 MP/cm2|
|Moiré control||Anti-Alias filter||Anti-Alias filter|
|Movie Capability||4k/25p Video||4K/24p Video|
|ISO Setting||100 – 25,600 ISO||100 – 25,600 ISO|
|ISO Boost||no Enhancement||100 – 51,200 ISO|
|Image Processor||DIGIC 8||DIGIC 8|
|Screen Specs||Canon M200||Canon M50|
|Viewfinder Type||no viewfinder||Electronic viewfinder|
|Viewfinder Field of View||100%|
|Viewfinder Resolution||2360k dots|
|LCD Framing||Live View||Live View|
|Rear LCD Size||3.0inch||3.0inch|
|LCD Resolution||1040k dots||1040k dots|
|LCD Attachment||Tilting screen||Swivel screen|
|Shooting Specs||Canon M200||Canon M50|
|Focus System||On-Sensor Phase-detect||On-Sensor Phase-detect|
|Manual Focusing Aid||Focus Peaking||Focus Peaking|
|Max Shutter Speed (mechanical)||1/4000s||1/4000s|
|Continuous Shooting||6.1 shutter flaps/s||10 shutter flaps/s|
|Shutter Life Expectancy||100 000 actuations||100 000 actuations|
|Time-Lapse Photography||no Intervalometer||Intervalometer built-in|
|Fill Flash||Built-in Flash||Built-in Flash|
|Storage Medium||SDXC cards||SDXC cards|
|Second Storage Option||Single card slot||Single card slot|
|UHS card support||UHS-I||UHS-I|
|Connectivity Specs||Canon M200||Canon M50|
|External Flash||no Hotshoe||Hotshoe|
|USB Connector||USB 2.0||USB 2.0|
|HDMI Port||micro HDMI||micro HDMI|
|Microphone Port||no MIC socket||External MIC port|
|Wifi Support||Wifi built-in||Wifi built-in|
|Bluetooth Support||Bluetooth built-in||Bluetooth built-in|
|Body Specs||Canon M200||Canon M50|
|Battery Life (CIPA)||315 shots per charge||235 shots per charge|
|Body Dimensions||108 x 67 x 35 mm|
(4.3 x 2.6 x 1.4 in)
|116 x 88 x 59 mm|
(4.6 x 3.5 x 2.3 in)
|Camera Weight||299 g (10.5 oz)||390 g (13.8 oz)|