What are the differences between the Canon EOS M50 and the Canon EOS M50 Mark II, going beyond this quick comparison of the basic features and attributes of each camera? Which one should you choose to purchase? Continue reading to find out how these two cameras stack up against one another in terms of the size of their bodies, the imaging sensors they contain, the shooting options they offer, the input-output connections they provide, and the reaction they received from professional reviewers.
In the following side-by-side comparison, you can see how the Canon M50 and the Canon M50 Mark II compare in terms of their overall dimensions and weights. The two cameras are discussed in light of their sizes in comparison to one another. There are three sequential perspectives depicted, beginning with the front, moving to the top, and ending with the back. The measurements of every size have been rounded to the nearest millimeter for consistency.
Both cameras are offered in a choice of two distinct hues each (black, white).
In this particular scenario, the Canon M50 and the Canon M50 Mark II have dimensions that are identical to one another in terms of both width and height, and hence, their bodies are the same size. The M50 Mark II, on the other hand, is one percent lighter than the M50 it replaces. In light of this, it is important to point out that neither the M50 nor the M50 Mark II is equipped with a weather-sealing mechanism.
The size and weight comparisons that were presented earlier are, to some extent, insufficient because they do not take into account the fact that both of these cameras require interchangeable lenses. Therefore, in order to acquire a comprehensive understanding of the differences between the two camera systems in terms of their dimensions and weights, you need to investigate and evaluate the characteristics of the various lenses that are at your disposal.
The following table provides a comparison of the two cameras’ most important physical specifications alongside a wider range of benchmarks. You can navigate to the CAM-parator app and select from a comprehensive list of cameras there if you would like to visualize and compare a different camera combination. Once you are there, you will have the option to do so.
Price is bound to play a significant role in whatsoever choice you make about a camera. The producer of the cameras has been targeting a specific market category, and the given launch pricing provides an idea of which market segment that is. Because it was released at a price that was somewhat cheaper (by 23 percent) than that of the M50, the M50 Mark II is more appealing to photographers who are working with limited financial resources. In most cases, retail prices remain relatively constant for the first few months after a product’s launch, but after a few months, discounts become available. After a certain point in the life cycle of the product, and in particular just before the launch of the model’s successor, additional price reductions and stock clearance sales frequently drive the price of the camera to an all-time low. Then, once the new version of the model has been out, there are frequently excellent prices to be had on the pre-owned market.
One of the most important aspects that determine the image quality captured by a digital camera is the size of the sensor included within the device. When comparing sensors of the same technological generation, one with a larger sensor would typically contain individual pixels that are larger in size. These larger pixels offer improved low-light sensitivity, greater dynamic range, and richer color depth than smaller pixel units in a sensor. In addition, a camera with a large sensor will provide the photographer with a greater degree of control over the image’s depth-of-field, and as a result, the ability to better separate a subject from the backdrop. Larger sensors, while generally leading to larger and heavier cameras and lenses, are more expensive to build. This is one of the drawbacks of using larger sensors.
Both of the cameras are being considered to make use of an APS-C sensor and have a format factor of 1.6, which is also commonly referred to as the “crop factor.” This positions the review cameras within the spectrum of camera sensors known as the medium-sized sensor cameras, which strive to strike a balance between image quality and portability. The ratio of the sensor’s width to its height is 3:2 in both of the cameras’ default configurations.
Both of the cameras that are being compared here have sensors that are exactly the same size, therefore they both have the same resolution of 24 megapixels. Because of the similarities between the M50 and the M50 Mark II sensor specifications, it can be deduced that both cameras have the same pixel density as well as the same pixel size. It is important to note, however, that the M50 Mark II is significantly more current than the M50 (by two years and seven months), and as a result, its sensor is likely to have benefited from technological advancements that have occurred during this time.
The Canon EOS M50 has a sensitivity range that extends from ISO 100 all the way up to ISO 25600 and can be expanded all the way up to ISO 51200. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II retains the identical ISO settings as its predecessor.
Both cameras make use of CMOS sensors, which stands for Complimentary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor, in terms of their imaging technology. The Bayer filter is utilized by both cameras in order to record RGB colors onto a photosensor grid that is square in shape. The majority of digital cameras have this particular configuration.
DxO Mark has collected and reported data on the sensor performance of a great number of cameras. In addition to publishing an overall camera score, this service evaluates and ranks the color depth (“DXO Portrait”), dynamic range (“DXO Landscape”), and low-light sensitivity (“DXO Sports”) of camera sensors. The following table gives an overview of the physical sensor properties, as well as the sensor quality measures for a selection of comparators to look at.
Many of today’s cameras can record video in addition to still photographs, giving users the ability to do both with a single device. Both of the cameras that are being taken into consideration feature sensors that have a read-out speed that is sufficiently fast for moving images, and both have the same movie requirements, which are 4K at 24 frames per second.
Cameras can and do differ in a variety of elements in addition to their bodies and their sensors. Both the M50 and the M50 Mark II have an electronic viewfinder, which is advantageous when framing photographs outside in bright sunshine. This feature is shared by both of these cameras. In addition, the resolution of both viewfinders is the same, coming in at 2360k dots. The following table provides a summary of some of the other fundamental features of the Canon M50 and Canon M50 Mark II in association with information for a selection of other cameras that are comparable to these two models.
Both cameras feature a rear screen that can be twisted and rotated around to face the front of the camera. Vloggers and photographers who are interested in capturing selfies are the types of people who will particularly like this feature.
The information on shutter speed that has been reported pertains to the utilization of the mechanical shutter. However, some cameras have solely an electronic shutter, while others have both a mechanical and an electronic shutter. Still, others have both an electronic shutter and a mechanical shutter. In point of fact, the Canon EOS M50 Mark II is one of those cameras that possesses an additional electronic shutter, which enables the user to take photographs without producing any audible noise. However, this mode is less ideal for taking pictures of moving subjects (since it increases the likelihood of a rolling shutter) and shooting in environments with artificial light sources (risk of flickering).
An intervalometer is a feature that is integrated into both the Canon M50 and the Canon M50 Mark II. This gives the photographer the ability to capture time-lapse sequences, such as a flower budding, a sunset, or the rising of the moon, without having to invest in an external camera trigger and the software that goes along with it.
When it comes to the archiving of photographic material, both the M50 and the M50 Mark II use SDXC cards as the medium for writing file data. UHS-I memory cards, which allow for ultra-high-speed data transfer of up to 104 megabytes per second, are compatible with both of these cameras.
When it comes to some imaging applications, the degree to which a camera is able to communicate with the environment in which it is placed might be a crucial factor in the decision-making process for selecting a camera. The table that follows gives an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS M50 and the Canon EOS M50 Mark II. In specifically, it focuses on the interfaces that both models of the camera (along with a few comparable models) offer for the control and transfer of data to and from accessories.
Canon’s most recent addition to their product line-up, the M50 Mark II, is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. On the other hand, the production of the M50 was canceled. The Canon M50 Mark II was released as a successor to the original M50 model, which was part of the same family of cameras. On the official website of Canon, you may get additional information on the two cameras (such as user guides and manuals), in addition to information regarding related accessories.
So, what are the takeaways from this? Between the Canon M50 and the Canon M50 Mark II, is there a model that stands out as being more popular? Which of these cameras is superior? The table that follows provides a synopsis of the relative strengths that each of the two competitors has.
Reasons to prefer the Canon EOS M50:
- More steeply discounted; has been available for a significantly longer period of time (launched in February 2018).
Advantages of the Canon EOS M50 Mark II:
- Has an electronic shutter option, so shooting can be done completely silently. This makes it less disturbing.
- Longer lasting: a single charge results in 305 additional shots as opposed to 235 shots for comparable models.
- More affordable: Was introduced into a market with lower pricing points (23 percent cheaper at launch).
- More modern: Since the launch of the M50, this update reflects the 2 years and 7 months of additional technological progress.
The M50 Mark II comes out on top of the competition when the relative strengths count (listed in the bullet points above) is taken into consideration as a measuring stick (4:1 points). However, the relevance of the various camera strengths will vary depending on the photographer. Before making a selection regarding a camera, you should consider the value of the various camera strengths in relation to your particular image requirements. A professional wedding photographer will interpret the differences between cameras in a way that is different from the perspective of a travel photographer, and somebody who is interested in cityscapes will have different requirements than someone who is interested in macro photography. Because of this, determining which camera is the best and whether or not it is worthwhile to purchase is typically a very personal choice.
Specifications: Canon M50 vs Canon M50 Mark II
|Camera Model||Canon M50||Canon M50 Mark II|
|Camera Type||Mirrorless system camera||Mirrorless system camera|
|Camera Lens||Canon EF-M mount lenses||Canon EF-M mount lenses|
|Launch Date||February 2018||October 2020|
|Launch Price||USD 779||USD 599|
|Sensor Specs||Canon M50||Canon M50 Mark II|
|Sensor Format||APS-C Sensor||APS-C Sensor|
|Sensor Size||22.3 x 14.9 mm||22.3 x 14.9 mm|
|Sensor Area||332.27 mm2||332.27 mm2|
|Sensor Diagonal||26.8 mm||26.8 mm|
|Sensor Resolution||24 Megapixels||24 Megapixels|
|Image Resolution||6000 x 4000 pixels||6000 x 4000 pixels|
|Pixel Pitch||3.72 μm||3.72 μm|
|Pixel Density||7.22 MP/cm2||7.22 MP/cm2|
|Moiré control||Anti-Alias filter||Anti-Alias filter|
|Movie Capability||4K/24p Video||4K/24p Video|
|ISO Setting||100 – 25,600 ISO||100 – 25,600 ISO|
|ISO Boost||100 – 51,200 ISO||100 – 51,200 ISO|
|Image Processor||DIGIC 8||DIGIC 8|
|Screen Specs||Canon M50||Canon M50 Mark II|
|Viewfinder Type||Electronic viewfinder||Electronic viewfinder|
|Viewfinder Field of View||100%||100%|
|Viewfinder Resolution||2360k dots||2360k dots|
|LCD Framing||Live View||Live View|
|Rear LCD Size||3.0inch||3.0inch|
|LCD Resolution||1040k dots||1040k dots|
|LCD Attachment||Swivel screen||Swivel screen|
|Shooting Specs||Canon M50||Canon M50 Mark II|
|Focus System||On-Sensor Phase-detect||On-Sensor Phase-detect|
|Manual Focusing Aid||Focus Peaking||Focus Peaking|
|Max Shutter Speed (mechanical)||1/4000s||1/4000s|
|Continuous Shooting||10 shutter flaps/s||10 shutter flaps/s|
|Shutter Life Expectancy||100 000 actuations||100 000 actuations|
|Electronic Shutter||no E-Shutter||YES|
|Time-Lapse Photography||Intervalometer built-in||Intervalometer built-in|
|Fill Flash||Built-in Flash||Built-in Flash|
|Storage Medium||SDXC cards||SDXC cards|
|Second Storage Option||Single card slot||Single card slot|
|UHS card support||UHS-I||UHS-I|
|Connectivity Specs||Canon M50||Canon M50 Mark II|
|USB Connector||USB 2.0||USB 2.0|
|HDMI Port||micro HDMI||micro HDMI|
|Microphone Port||External MIC port||External MIC port|
|Wifi Support||Wifi built-in||Wifi built-in|
|Bluetooth Support||Bluetooth built-in||Bluetooth built-in|
|Body Specs||Canon M50||Canon M50 Mark II|
|Battery Life (CIPA)||235 shots per charge||305 shots per charge|
|Body Dimensions||116 x 88 x 59 mm|
(4.6 x 3.5 x 2.3 in)
|116 x 88 x 59 mm|
(4.6 x 3.5 x 2.3 in)
|Camera Weight||390 g (13.8 oz)||387 g (13.7 oz)|